Everyone, I get that you can write violence, even very disturbing violence and use it to tell a story, but I really don't believe that's what Rosenberg is doing. His history of shocking random murders is evidence of that. He is writing for shocks and not to tell a larger story about violence against women. He is the violence against women.
Why can they just call it shoddy writing and get over it? The fucking OP that thread wrote better about all this than the actual article he linked. Is badly written, no need to call the writer misogynistic or cry because you don’t like cheap melodrama in your xMen comics.
I really don't understand the complaint, because looking at that panel in no way do I get the sense that I'm supposed to be rooting for the murderer, or that he is justifying his murder in a way that seems like a reasonable excuse, so any parallels to IRL transphobic attacks would seem to be condemning them, in much the way mutant comics have allegorised marginalised groups pretty much since day one.
Also apparently Rahne Ah Cain't Believe She Ain't Scotch powers now is she turns into
a pack of wolves

e: yea, what HaughtyFrank said. Are they just mad that cishet scum wrote this?