meanwhile back on ResetERA.com, WHERE MEAN FIVE YEAR OLDS ARE BANNED
I don't think it's reasonable to demand that media should be designed around the possibility that unsavory people might take it out of context and weaponize it.
I think it's entirely reasonable to demand that when you're making media depicting one of the most abused collectives in existence. I mean, if you make media without a care how it might be used against the very people you're depicting, it's hard to think you care much for them other than using them to window-dress your product.
And I mean, it's not even just the alt-right weaponizing them that shows it's problematic; it has been criticised nearly universally by transgender people. How many of them did they actually run the ad through before OKing it? It's kind of hard to imagine it's more than zero.
Oh FFS, more this weaponizing bullshit.
ERA's impression of what the alt-right is doing with this ad:
(Image removed from quote.)
What the alt-right is actually doing of anything with it:
(Image removed from quote.)
And UNIVERSALLY criticized by transgendered people. They've been polled? Fuck outta here.
is the alt right actually doing anything with this ad?
I mean is most of it just questioning wait a minute, I thought girldick was good, now it's bad?
wouldn't it be an inflammatory generalization to say that all people now asking this question must be alt right? I bet a lot of normal people are just as confused as to what they want
or hey maybe the alt right is just sitting back and grinning as they watch the flames on resetera as they destroy themselves from the inside out? does that count as weaponizing, when you don't even use it and just watch and laugh?