Author Topic: The Outside Link Thread (All Your GAF, OA, SA, YouTube, etc. Links Go In Here!) (Read 3008869 times)

lennedsay · « **Reply #31560 on:** August 18, 2009, 10:01:03 PM »

Quote from: demi on August 18, 2009, 09:58:56 PM

I saw BlackMage he isnt prime grade-A beef. He is a scrawny wimp.

My dream type of guy...

BlackMage · « **Reply #31561 on:** August 18, 2009, 10:03:58 PM »

Quote from: demi on August 18, 2009, 09:58:56 PM

I saw BlackMage he isnt prime grade-A beef. He is a scrawny wimp.

hey you ain't so well nourished yourself!

demi · « **Reply #31562 on:** August 18, 2009, 10:05:54 PM »

I never said I wasn't, DWEEB

lennedsay · « **Reply #31563 on:** August 18, 2009, 10:06:45 PM »

It's a wuss-off!

Bildi · « **Reply #31564 on:** August 18, 2009, 10:12:16 PM »

Asians are naturally lean, though.

Don Flamenco · « **Reply #31565 on:** August 18, 2009, 10:12:25 PM »

Quote from: BlackMage on August 18, 2009, 10:03:58 PM

Quote from: demi on August 18, 2009, 09:58:56 PM
I saw BlackMage he isnt prime grade-A beef. He is a scrawny wimp.

hey you ain't so well nourished yourself!

he's a bottom. that's why you guys are repelling each other. you're both bottoms. you can't have two bottoms unless the bear wants two bottoms.

lennedsay · « **Reply #31566 on:** August 18, 2009, 10:19:48 PM »

demi · « **Reply #31567 on:** August 18, 2009, 10:22:10 PM »

I'll drag from my fucking truck girl.

lennedsay · « **Reply #31568 on:** August 18, 2009, 10:23:04 PM »

Quote from: demi on August 18, 2009, 10:22:10 PM

I'll drag from my fucking truck girl.

No one else here knows.

demi · « **Reply #31569 on:** August 18, 2009, 11:04:37 PM »

Yeti check your fuckin PM... god why cant people use IM these days.

tiesto · « **Reply #31570 on:** August 19, 2009, 12:06:45 AM »

Quote from: Zero Hero on August 18, 2009, 03:10:02 PM

[youtube=560,345]UlzoL-wQwio[/youtube]

Video was filmed on the LIE, can't say I blame him... LIE traffic fucking BLOWS

Beezy · « **Reply #31571 on:** August 19, 2009, 12:10:27 AM »

I love that vid.

Yeti · « **Reply #31572 on:** August 19, 2009, 12:11:10 AM »

Quote from: demi on August 18, 2009, 11:04:37 PM

Yeti check your fuckin PM... god why cant people use IM these days.

I checked it, jeeze, what more do you want from me?

E-DuB · « **Reply #31573 on:** August 19, 2009, 12:11:14 AM »

Quote from: Great Rumbler on August 18, 2009, 02:04:51 PM

Quote from: Willco on August 18, 2009, 01:38:34 PM
I approved his and Yixian's account.

And now...we wait.

Wait, who is this?

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #31574 on:** August 19, 2009, 12:11:38 AM »

We gotta get right, Kevin. We gotta get right.

E-DuB · « **Reply #31575 on:** August 19, 2009, 12:16:39 AM »

Quote from: lennedsay on August 18, 2009, 10:19:48 PM

(Image removed from quote.)

Also, this is fucking hilarious!!!!!!

Bildi · « **Reply #31576 on:** August 19, 2009, 01:30:49 AM »

That vid is great.

Bildi · « **Reply #31577 on:** August 19, 2009, 01:37:54 AM »

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=371638

Is it just me, or does God of War 3 just not look that great in these screens? I'm not seeing the reason to go nuts.

Beezy · « **Reply #31578 on:** August 19, 2009, 01:43:44 AM »

Agreed, but I'm not gonna post in there because I'm sure I'll be labeled as a troll and banned.

Great Rumbler · « **Reply #31579 on:** August 19, 2009, 02:05:30 AM »

Quote from: Bildi on August 19, 2009, 01:37:54 AM

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=371638

Is it just me, or does God of War 3 just not look that great in these screens? I'm not seeing the reason to go nuts.

Yeah, I don't really see it either.

Bildi · « **Reply #31580 on:** August 19, 2009, 02:08:03 AM »

I mean really, THIS looks like a painting come to life, fantastic, astounding, astonishing?

spoiler (click to show/hide)

[close]

It's OK to be hyped for a game, but let's not lose common sense.

Great Rumbler · « **Reply #31581 on:** August 19, 2009, 02:11:49 AM »

There were parts of Rage that looked like a painting come to life, especially that awesome, awesome sky. But that? Not so much.

Bildi · « **Reply #31582 on:** August 19, 2009, 02:40:37 AM »

We're discussing reactions to the graphics of the game, not how the game plays. Try to keep up mang.

Bildi · « **Reply #31583 on:** August 19, 2009, 02:46:11 AM »

That's more like it.

But really, I was genuinely wondering if I was missing something or if there was just a bit of mass hysteria in that thread.

BlueTsunami · « **Reply #31584 on:** August 19, 2009, 02:50:18 AM »

Dudes, taking out PS2 BC in the PS3 was a major business decision that saved the PS3!

Narag · « **Reply #31585 on:** August 19, 2009, 02:59:06 AM »

That thread is killing me. Its like the controllers without rumble shit all over again.

I've never understood how Onix has lasted as long as he has too.

Oblivion · « **Reply #31586 on:** August 19, 2009, 03:54:58 AM »

Those GoW3 shots are even less impressive once you also take into account that it's running at 30 FPS.

RSX

Tieno · « **Reply #31587 on:** August 19, 2009, 04:42:09 AM »

Quote from: Borys on August 19, 2009, 04:33:48 AM

As long as I can rip motherfucking gorgon heads I am set with GoW3

How u gonna play it?

OptimoPeach · « **Reply #31588 on:** August 19, 2009, 04:44:00 AM »

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=17191617&postcount=17

Am I just an asshole or is this guy a sopping vagina?

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #31589 on:** August 19, 2009, 04:53:06 AM »

[youtube=560,345]el8v6ziieOQ[/youtube]

Bildi · « **Reply #31590 on:** August 19, 2009, 05:40:40 AM »

Quote from: OptimoPeach on August 19, 2009, 04:44:00 AM

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=17191617&postcount=17

Am I just an asshole or is this guy a sopping vagina?

I dunno Optimo, I don't think you're being an asshole but really I've seen much bigger sopping vaginas.

Flannel Boy · « **Reply #31591 on:** August 19, 2009, 06:44:59 AM »

Quote from: Green Man on August 19, 2009, 04:54:37 AM

Quote from: OptimoPeach on August 19, 2009, 04:44:00 AM
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=17191617&postcount=17

Am I just an asshole or is this guy a sopping vagina?

Clearly his missed the part where as a child you're told to ignore insults if you know they aren't true.

I had no idea that school-yard rules applied to defamation laws.

WrikaWrek · « **Reply #31592 on:** August 19, 2009, 07:14:33 AM »

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=371582

Holy shit, what's up with GAF's knight in shinning armor complex? The vid is funny.

Veidt · « **Reply #31593 on:** August 19, 2009, 07:31:48 AM »

wtf is up with gaf.

OptimoPeach · « **Reply #31594 on:** August 19, 2009, 08:14:47 AM »

Quote from: Malek on August 19, 2009, 06:44:59 AM

I had no idea that school-yard rules applied to defamation laws.

Is this suit typical for a defamation/libel case, though? A single snarky comment from an anonymous blogger posting his bullshit in some dark corner of the internet?

Besides, I'm not arguing whether or not she is within her rights to press charges. I understand that "skank" technically falls under the definition of statement of verifiable fact (right?), I just find it risible that he supports that technicality under such frivolous circumstances.

But after rereading the thread, I guess he wasn't really defending her decision to sue, so whatever. I was pissy over not being able to watch the new Dexter episode and I wanted to start shit with someone.

For the record, though, could a judge hypothetically throw out this case if he wanted to?

lol, I sent him a PM apologizing

BamYouHaveAids · « **Reply #31595 on:** August 19, 2009, 01:37:32 PM »

Quote from: OptimoPeach on August 19, 2009, 08:14:47 AM

Quote from: Malek on August 19, 2009, 06:44:59 AM
I had no idea that school-yard rules applied to defamation laws.
Is this suit typical for a defamation/libel case, though? A single snarky comment from an anonymous blogger posting his bullshit in some dark corner of the internet?

Besides, I'm not arguing whether or not she is within her rights to press charges. I understand that "skank" technically falls under the definition of statement of verifiable fact (right?), I just find it risible that he supports that technicality under such frivolous circumstances.

But after rereading the thread, I guess he wasn't really defending her decision to sue, so whatever. I was pissy over not being able to watch the new Dexter episode and I wanted to start shit with someone.

For the record, though, could a judge hypothetically throw out this case if he wanted to?

lol, I sent him a PM apologizing

pussy

sue me i don't give a fuck

OptimoPeach · « **Reply #31596 on:** August 19, 2009, 01:54:08 PM »

twerd · « **Reply #31597 on:** August 19, 2009, 01:55:11 PM »

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=371716

Madrun Badrun · « **Reply #31598 on:** August 19, 2009, 01:55:45 PM »

drew · « **Reply #31599 on:** August 19, 2009, 03:28:19 PM »

borys is blind

BlueTsunami · « **Reply #31600 on:** August 19, 2009, 03:32:04 PM »

I wonder if Borys is using other Windows handicap features. He probably has some automated voice reading my post right now. DICK COCK POO POO PLANE.

BlueTsunami · « **Reply #31601 on:** August 19, 2009, 03:34:16 PM »

Mmmmm, automated sassy

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #31602 on:** August 19, 2009, 03:38:40 PM »

From Synthesizer Patel and MAF on Facebook:

... and the companion video.

Kestastrophe · « **Reply #31603 on:** August 19, 2009, 03:45:53 PM »

i saw that earlier today. Semi-related

Beezy · « **Reply #31604 on:** August 19, 2009, 03:47:37 PM »

Madrun Badrun · « **Reply #31605 on:** August 19, 2009, 03:48:09 PM »

BlueTsunami · « **Reply #31606 on:** August 19, 2009, 03:52:01 PM »

Quote from: Willco on August 19, 2009, 03:38:40 PM

From Synthesizer Patel and MAF on Facebook:

(Image removed from quote.)

... and the companion video.

That is the best thing ever

ManaByte · « **Reply #31607 on:** August 19, 2009, 04:26:00 PM »

Quote from: fistfulofmetal on August 18, 2009, 12:47:11 AM

(Image removed from quote.)

[youtube=560,345][/youtube]

twerd · « **Reply #31608 on:** August 19, 2009, 04:31:44 PM »

she's really damn hot, but her spot at the microsoft press conference was cringe-worthy.

Great Rumbler · « **Reply #31609 on:** August 19, 2009, 04:54:15 PM »

Now HERE'S a painting come to life:

Rage

id

John Carmack

fistfulofmetal · « **Reply #31610 on:** August 19, 2009, 05:02:14 PM »

So Rage is basically what Fallout 3 would of been if it had been a good shooter as well? Awesome!!!!!

twerd · « **Reply #31611 on:** August 19, 2009, 05:08:55 PM »

Quote from: Green Man on August 19, 2009, 04:49:43 PM

This video and that fucking E3 press conference is why I fucking hate nerds. I get it, she's a woman and that's kool but God damn this(and all that other The Guild shit) is just so UNFUNNY so stop supporting it.

dr. horrible's sing along blog

watch it and try not to fall in love.

the environs looks awesome in that RAGE screenshot but the textures on that human model are

Great Rumbler · « **Reply #31612 on:** August 19, 2009, 05:14:09 PM »

Quote from: twerd on August 19, 2009, 05:08:55 PM

Quote from: Green Man on August 19, 2009, 04:49:43 PM
This video and that fucking E3 press conference is why I fucking hate nerds. I get it, she's a woman and that's kool but God damn this(and all that other The Guild shit) is just so UNFUNNY so stop supporting it.
but the textures on that human model are

It's just a random bandit.

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #31613 on:** August 19, 2009, 05:20:43 PM »

Is that from the Wii version?

twerd · « **Reply #31614 on:** August 19, 2009, 05:22:41 PM »

it's only 3 parts you lazy bum.

Great Rumbler · « **Reply #31615 on:** August 19, 2009, 05:23:25 PM »

Quote from: Borys on August 19, 2009, 05:17:58 PM

Quote from: Great Rumbler on August 19, 2009, 04:54:15 PM
Now HERE'S a painting come to life:

spoiler (click to show/hide)
[close]

Rage
id
John Carmack

Low-res, flat textures all around - look at the rock spine on the right or the bandit's body texture.

Doesn't look anywhere near impressive my man. Bad screen.

etiolate · « **Reply #31616 on:** August 19, 2009, 06:04:52 PM »

It looks like the character and the rocks were made out of the same clay material.

twerd · « **Reply #31617 on:** August 19, 2009, 06:22:55 PM »

Quote from: etiolate on August 19, 2009, 06:04:52 PM

It looks like the character and the rocks were made out of the same clay material.

how poetic. aristotle would be proud.

Flannel Boy · « **Reply #31618 on:** August 19, 2009, 06:25:54 PM »

Quote from: OptimoPeach on August 19, 2009, 08:14:47 AM

Quote from: Malek on August 19, 2009, 06:44:59 AM
I had no idea that school-yard rules applied to defamation laws.
Is this suit typical for a defamation/libel case, though? A single snarky comment from an anonymous blogger posting his bullshit in some dark corner of the internet?

Besides, I'm not arguing whether or not she is within her rights to press charges. I understand that "skank" technically falls under the definition of statement of verifiable fact (right?), I just find it risible that he supports that technicality under such frivolous circumstances.

But after rereading the thread, I guess he wasn't really defending her decision to sue, so whatever. I was pissy over not being able to watch the new Dexter episode and I wanted to start shit with someone.

For the record, though, could a judge hypothetically throw out this case if he wanted to?

It's not typical; that's why it's in the news. But I don't see why anonymous Internet bloggers should receive protection from their potentially tortious (tortful lol) conduct. They should be subject to the same limits of expression as those who engage in more traditional forms of expression.

I don't believe that calling someone a "skank" in the context of a blog post is a statement of verifiable fact. It's an expression of contempt that can't be proven true or false. If the blogger said the model was a "skank who sucked cocks for gigs," that would obviously be different.

But the blogger also went on to claim that the model was the "Skankiest in NYC" and a "psychotic, lying, whoring … skank." This seems to blur the line between expressions of contempt and factual statements.

(Canadian defamation laws are different: the plaintiff doesn't have to prove the statement was false or that he was actually damaged. And the press receives far less protection. In the US, malice must be shown in a case involving the defamation of a public figure. Malice is inconsequential in Canada.)

Great Rumbler · « **Reply #31619 on:** August 19, 2009, 06:38:16 PM »

YouTube Comment Snob

News:

Author Topic: The Outside Link Thread (All Your GAF, OA, SA, YouTube, etc. Links Go In Here!) (Read 3008869 times)