Author Topic: star trek  (Read 331136 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2100 on: November 28, 2019, 05:53:57 PM »
It's from a webisode, not the main TV series.

Its canon now  :lol
What

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2101 on: November 28, 2019, 11:49:53 PM »
 :picard

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2102 on: December 01, 2019, 06:56:29 AM »


Quote
On November 19th, Variety confirmed that Star Trek 4 is back in development, under the helm of writer/director Noah Hawley. However, this is but the most recent of several different iterations of Star Trek 4, a movie which was first announced more than three years ago. Could it actually move forward and happen this time, or are there still hurdles to overcome?

As you are about to find out, there are.

In this video, we will first look back at the earlier iterations of the proposed 4th Kelvin Star Trek movie, and why none of them made it to the big screen. Then we’ll see how Noah Hawley’s Star Trek 4 has to overcome the very same hurdles that sunk those, and how the imminent re-merger between Viacom and CBS plays into all of this.

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot
  • Senior Member

toku

  • 𝕩𝕩𝕩
  • Senior Member

nachobro

  • Live Más
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2105 on: December 08, 2019, 08:49:53 PM »
oh no :( rip

Occam

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2106 on: December 08, 2019, 08:50:13 PM »
Sad, he was great.
504

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2107 on: December 08, 2019, 09:10:43 PM »
Nooo :stahp

Rip

One of the GOAT Trek characters and actors
IYKYK

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: star trek
« Reply #2108 on: December 08, 2019, 10:15:04 PM »
©@©™

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2109 on: December 09, 2019, 01:16:33 AM »
Holy shit. Marina Sirtis' husband died in his sleep.

Death all around Trek right now
IYKYK

MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2110 on: December 09, 2019, 04:02:16 AM »
Rip Constable
What

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2111 on: December 09, 2019, 08:10:25 AM »
 :fbm

Tuckers Law

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2112 on: December 09, 2019, 09:33:49 AM »
Damn

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
ὕβρις

Occam

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2114 on: December 10, 2019, 10:30:12 AM »
504

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2115 on: December 10, 2019, 03:59:42 PM »
Oh boy, Voyager is so terribly flaccid.
ὕβρις

Occam

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2116 on: December 10, 2019, 04:06:35 PM »
Voyager's only interesting character is the doctor.
504

nachobro

  • Live Más
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2117 on: December 10, 2019, 04:23:06 PM »
cause the doctor is the only one to get any real, logical development. neelix got a few random tidbits, seven had stop/start things and a random and pointless relationship, but most of the others were relatively static.

MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2118 on: December 10, 2019, 05:12:48 PM »
Tom and Blanda episodes

zzzzzz

Actually I like the one where Tom trades for that ship and wants to turn it into another Runabout and gets brainwashwd by the AI
What

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2119 on: December 10, 2019, 05:37:29 PM »
Voyager's only interesting character is the doctor.

No lie, he's even somehow making that terrible Beowulf holodreck episode enjoyable.
ὕβρις

nachobro

  • Live Más
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2120 on: December 10, 2019, 05:59:14 PM »
the doctors always end up being interested though. bones, pulaski, bashir, emh, and phlox were all great.

crusher :nope

Tuckers Law

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2121 on: December 10, 2019, 06:30:29 PM »
Maybe TNG’s “Sub Rosa” was the price we all had to pay for a future of great doctors in trek.

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
ὕβρις

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2123 on: December 11, 2019, 05:51:45 AM »
Belianna the worst Klingon ever made.

Vok from Disco is better.

IYKYK

nachobro

  • Live Más
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2124 on: December 11, 2019, 08:54:27 AM »
the only klingon thing about her is that she's vaguely pissed about something all the time :lol

MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2125 on: December 11, 2019, 09:08:11 AM »
the only klingon thing about her is that she's vaguely pissed about something all the time :lol

Whats the difference with a human woman then?
What

Occam

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2126 on: December 11, 2019, 09:46:28 AM »
Vaguely being something accurately sums up most of Voyager's characters, which apart from their total lack of character-development is why they are all so fondly remembered. B'ellana is vaguely Klingon, Chakotay is vaguely native American, Tom Paris is vaguely delinquent, Neelix is vaguely annoying, Harry Kim is vaguely boring. If I had to sum up Voyager in a single word, it would be "bland".
« Last Edit: December 11, 2019, 01:04:56 PM by Occam »
504

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2127 on: December 11, 2019, 11:05:35 AM »
Tuvok is EXTREMELY Vulcan. Not vague at all. Guy is among the shows best characters and one of my favorite Vulcans.
IYKYK

Occam

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2128 on: December 11, 2019, 01:04:34 PM »
You are right, Tuvok doesn't belong on that list, I'll edit my post.
504

Tuckers Law

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2129 on: December 11, 2019, 01:50:35 PM »
One thing you can’t deny about Voyager, though, is that it brought out one of the most villainous characters in Trek history.

Gul Dukat looked at Janeway’s actions and was all, “Damn.”   :jeanluc

spoiler (click to show/hide)
I legitimately loved Brad Dourifs character, we don’t get to see that aspect of broken humanity often in the Trek universe.  Shame it was on Voyager and not DS9, where they probably could’ve made his story flourish even more.
[close]
« Last Edit: December 11, 2019, 01:57:43 PM by Tuckers Law »

MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2130 on: December 11, 2019, 02:09:16 PM »
Tuvok is a good guy I like him
What

GreatSageEqualOfHeaven

  • Dumbass Monkey
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2131 on: December 11, 2019, 02:32:12 PM »
eh has pon farr and doesn't afraid of anything

nachobro

  • Live Más
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2132 on: December 11, 2019, 02:36:58 PM »
remember when paris had to make vr porn of tuvok's wife so he could bang out in the holodeck? :lol

iirc that's also the episode where the doctor tries to lez out in seven's body

Tuckers Law

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2133 on: December 11, 2019, 02:43:53 PM »
Should’ve commissioned Barclay for some next-level holo-erotica.  That holodeck would’ve been greased over in Vulcan nut.

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2134 on: December 12, 2019, 05:38:40 PM »
Star Trek Voyager "The 37ers"

- "We built CITIES, striving CITIES !"
- "You must come SEE our CITIES !"
- "We"d like you to be our guest in our CITIES, such wonderful SIGHTS !"

*cross-fade to Janeway in her office*

- "Wow those cities sure were something !"

 :mike

Such a mind fuck, I kept expecting some reveal that the cities and human descendants were fake (hence the insistence that they were almost too Earth like and too good) but it was really just outrageous cost saving.
ὕβρις

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2135 on: December 12, 2019, 06:18:50 PM »
The actor playing Chakotay got a rough deal with all the Native American pot pourri.
ὕβρις

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2136 on: December 13, 2019, 08:25:10 PM »

Tasty

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2137 on: December 13, 2019, 08:32:06 PM »

GreatSageEqualOfHeaven

  • Dumbass Monkey
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2138 on: December 14, 2019, 09:26:57 AM »
I guess losing the showrunner would be bad news if I was sat here thinking what they'd shown of picard looked really good?
:idont

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2139 on: December 15, 2019, 07:29:29 PM »
ὕβρις

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2140 on: December 15, 2019, 07:37:20 PM »
Where no man has shilled before.  :ryker

ὕβρις

MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2141 on: December 17, 2019, 11:33:02 AM »
DS9  :quark

stays great
What

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2142 on: December 18, 2019, 02:34:38 AM »
Where no man has shilled before.  :ryker
Man they really don't care about the Prime Directive do they.

edit: of course this is in the comments and there's a big argument over it :dead

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2143 on: December 18, 2019, 02:36:50 AM »
ViscountStratton
5 years ago
I'm a bit annoyed at how many fans seem outraged at this. I'm a hardcore Trek fan and I think it's awsome they used this for a commercial. And a tech company at that, how very fitting. And to all you people saying Star Trek "sold out", get over yourselves. Considering Star Trek was a TV show which sought to get ratings, the whole "selling out" argument makes no sense. It may be hard for some fanboys to believe, but Paramount doesn't receieve funding from the United Federation of Planets to make the series. It's kinda fictional, to say the least.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2144 on: December 18, 2019, 02:39:21 AM »
http://blog.trekcore.com/2013/10/exclusive-inside-boole-babbages-trek-vision/
Quote
After a bit of searching, we were able to track down Pat Letsos – a senior marketing director at Boole & Babbage during the time this video was produced – and she took the time to speak with us about how this commercial came to be, how Jonathan Frakes got nabbed for the role, and the big question everybody asks: how much did this thing cost!?

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2145 on: December 18, 2019, 05:20:29 AM »
ὕβρις

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2146 on: December 18, 2019, 05:27:04 AM »
that subreddit :dead :dead :dead :dead




VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2147 on: December 18, 2019, 08:55:35 AM »
ὕβρις

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2148 on: December 19, 2019, 04:32:42 PM »
Is Keiko the worst ? A scientific, quantitative argument.

https://www.womenatwarp.com/is-keiko-obrien-the-worst-a-discourse-analysis/
ὕβρις

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2149 on: December 19, 2019, 04:44:26 PM »
keiko is fine in ds9
IYKYK

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2150 on: December 19, 2019, 05:04:33 PM »
ὕβρις

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2151 on: December 19, 2019, 05:19:22 PM »
Not sure if your laugh is ironic or not because that one is an old classic. So old it has grey hair.
IYKYK

Tasty

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2152 on: December 20, 2019, 01:30:16 PM »
https://io9.gizmodo.com/in-a-new-look-at-star-trek-picard-jean-lucs-a-man-on-1840555153

Long-haired vulcan with a samurai sword, Seven o' Ninetails full-on Halo 2 dual wielding PEW PEW, and chosen one girl who is almost certainly half-Borg or something doing Black Widow flips and shit...

No "spaceship hands" yet but a lot of Dominion-level space battle clusterfuckery, that's what I'm reminded of when I hear the name "Picard."

Trek is just as dead as Wars.

MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2153 on: December 20, 2019, 01:36:44 PM »
What

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2154 on: December 20, 2019, 01:44:26 PM »
https://io9.gizmodo.com/in-a-new-look-at-star-trek-picard-jean-lucs-a-man-on-1840555153

Long-haired vulcan with a samurai sword, Seven o' Ninetails full-on Halo 2 dual wielding PEW PEW, and chosen one girl who is almost certainly half-Borg or something doing Black Widow flips and shit...

No "spaceship hands" yet but a lot of Dominion-level space battle clusterfuckery, that's what I'm reminded of when I hear the name "Picard."

Trek is just as dead as Wars.

Be careful on becoming too cynical. It makes hearts black.

My hope is that it's done to feel in casual viewers. It has a lot of "please watch the show :tocry" going on. Not only are all sequences action oriented but it ends with Picard chatting with Number One Will Riker. It's a way to present the show as pleasing as possible. At least, that's the hope.
IYKYK

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2155 on: December 20, 2019, 02:17:48 PM »
People aren't watching new shit (Orville)
IYKYK

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2156 on: December 20, 2019, 02:24:36 PM »
https://io9.gizmodo.com/in-a-new-look-at-star-trek-picard-jean-lucs-a-man-on-1840555153

Long-haired vulcan with a samurai sword, Seven o' Ninetails full-on Halo 2 dual wielding PEW PEW, and chosen one girl who is almost certainly half-Borg or something doing Black Widow flips and shit...

No "spaceship hands" yet but a lot of Dominion-level space battle clusterfuckery, that's what I'm reminded of when I hear the name "Picard."

Trek is just as dead as Wars.


MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2157 on: December 20, 2019, 02:40:36 PM »
https://io9.gizmodo.com/in-a-new-look-at-star-trek-picard-jean-lucs-a-man-on-1840555153

Long-haired vulcan with a samurai sword, Seven o' Ninetails full-on Halo 2 dual wielding PEW PEW, and chosen one girl who is almost certainly half-Borg or something doing Black Widow flips and shit...

No "spaceship hands" yet but a lot of Dominion-level space battle clusterfuckery, that's what I'm reminded of when I hear the name "Picard."

Trek is just as dead as Wars.

 :quark :heh
What

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2158 on: December 20, 2019, 05:45:01 PM »
Profit & Lace : So bad :quark

But even with such terrible episodes, DS9 is more engaging on virtue of its characters than Voyager.
ὕβρις

MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2159 on: December 20, 2019, 06:00:05 PM »
Profit & Lace : So bad :quark

But even with such terrible episodes, DS9 is more engaging on virtue of its characters than Voyager.

A 2015 binge-watching guide for Star Trek: Deep Space Nine by W.I.R.E.D. recommended skipping this episode.[2]

In 2016, SyFy included this episode in a group of Star Trek franchise episodes they felt were commonly disliked but "deserved a second chance".[3]

In 2017, this episode was rated the 9th worst episode of the Star Trek franchise up to that time, by ScreenRant, which related the episode to the film Tootsie.[4]

WhatCulture ranked this episode the 4th worst episode of the Star Trek franchise.[5]
What