Author Topic: star trek  (Read 331115 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Tuckers Law

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2040 on: August 20, 2019, 08:03:01 PM »
I never watched Voyager from the start, only caught a few episodes here and there, so I’ve been doing a full watch-through of it and am midway through season 4.  I’d already seen Threshold prior to this and figured that was the nadir of the show, but there have been so many bad moments beyond that already.
  • Like, Janeway makes a clearly bad deal with the Borg, the writers know it because they give Chakotay this huge beat about why it’s such a damn bad idea, yet in the end its played off as a “Janeway was right” without any manner of consequence.
  • FUCKING TUVIX, an episode that could be fantastic Trek, until the last moments when once again this megalomaniacal hard-nosed captain turns it into a big pile of “what the fuck!?!”
  • There’s this episode where they visit a planet of telepaths that have thought-crime, and at first Janeway works with their local laws like a good starfleet officer would, all whilst trying to find a solution to save Torres from being lobotomized.  Once they reach an impasse and the thought-sheriff decides to damage Torres brain, and despite her knowing Torres isn’t responsible, Janeway is suddenly all “oh well, nothing I can do.”  Like, I don’t expect her to go all nuts deep like Kirk would to save his crew, but she did not at all have her crews back on this one, and seemingly only ever has their backs when she “feels” like it.

Janeway is the anti-Picard.  She’s so awful at promoting the core values of Starfleet that of course they would make her an admiral.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2041 on: August 20, 2019, 11:25:48 PM »
obligatory: Janeway 👏 is 👏 the 👏 villain 👏

Tuckers Law

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2042 on: August 21, 2019, 06:36:44 PM »
Okay, just watched the one where a hirogen and species super-8 are on the ship, and to save the ship Seven disobeys Janeways orders, and then takes a massive verbal-shit on Janeway about it.  I wasn’t too keen about Seven at first, but she’s starting to grow on me.

Now I can’t wait for the show to later nonsensically turn things around and make it out as Janeway somehow being in the right there.

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2043 on: August 21, 2019, 10:02:07 PM »
Okay, just watched the one where a hirogen and species super-8 are on the ship, and to save the ship Seven disobeys Janeways orders, and then takes a massive verbal-shit on Janeway about it.  I wasn’t too keen about Seven at first, but she’s starting to grow on me.

Now I can’t wait for the show to later nonsensically turn things around and make it out as Janeway somehow being in the right there.

Don't you DARE make me interested in Voyager! It's the one Trek series I've nearly entirely evaded.

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2044 on: August 21, 2019, 11:20:35 PM »
SEVEN :jeb

Mulgrew HATED Jeri Ryan because she took over her show and got into tight outfits.
IYKYK

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2045 on: August 22, 2019, 04:32:42 PM »
they made up at a convention, Mulgrew admitted she "was a bitch about some stuff" :lol

Star Trek Family :heart

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: star trek
« Reply #2046 on: August 23, 2019, 12:13:19 AM »
I don’t want my moms to fight.
©@©™

Tuckers Law

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2047 on: August 23, 2019, 03:27:22 AM »
The thing that annoys me is Mulgrew is a really good actor, I feel like she would portray an excellent starfleet captain probably the equal of Kirk/Picard/Sisko, if only the writing of the character was there.

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2048 on: August 23, 2019, 04:07:59 AM »

Tuckers Law

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2049 on: August 23, 2019, 04:16:00 AM »
Oh shit!  Captain Geordi!



Levar Burton is so much better than this show.
« Last Edit: August 23, 2019, 04:22:56 AM by Tuckers Law »

GreatSageEqualOfHeaven

  • Dumbass Monkey
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2050 on: August 23, 2019, 06:36:56 AM »
Voyager did pretty much go off the rails with 7 though, where basically every plot was about 7, and she was the cause of or solution to the Problem Of The Week

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2051 on: August 23, 2019, 09:19:36 AM »
The thing that annoys me is Mulgrew is a really good actor
She's amazing in NTSF:SD:SUV.






Tasty

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2052 on: August 23, 2019, 09:30:31 AM »
She was absolutely, 100% perfect as Red in OITNB.

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: star trek
« Reply #2053 on: August 23, 2019, 09:42:07 AM »
Yeah, but how great was she in UDSFK:JLK-SDJT?
©@©™

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2054 on: August 27, 2019, 04:19:27 AM »

Tuckers Law

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2055 on: August 27, 2019, 06:34:27 PM »
Ah, I was wondering if Jeffrey Combs would show up in Voyager, or if even he smelled it’s taint all the way back in Deep Space Nine and refused.

Edit: And now The Rock shows up, this is wild.
« Last Edit: August 27, 2019, 06:40:40 PM by Tuckers Law »

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2056 on: August 27, 2019, 10:10:07 PM »
the promo for that episode is one of the best considering what actually happens in it:

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2057 on: August 27, 2019, 10:10:40 PM »
VOYAGER'S BATTLESTAR BABE

Tuckers Law

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2058 on: August 29, 2019, 07:25:16 PM »
Damn, I just realized the Borg Queen is being played by the same actor that plays Moira Queen in Arrow.  Even with all that necrotic flesh and metal embedded in her skin, she’s still fine as hell.  She can assimilate me anytime.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2059 on: August 31, 2019, 11:49:45 PM »


 :brazilcry

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: star trek
« Reply #2060 on: September 01, 2019, 12:21:54 AM »
Then it turned into a threeway. :jared
©@©™

Tuckers Law

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2061 on: September 13, 2019, 03:56:56 AM »
Finished Voyager.  Been stupid busy lately and am still collecting my thoughts on the show overall, but for now I’ll just say that I have some opinions about this show.

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2062 on: September 13, 2019, 06:47:51 AM »
Finished Voyager.  Been stupid busy lately and am still collecting my thoughts on the show overall, but for now I’ll just say that I have some opinions about this show.
if they are positive keep them to yourself!

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2063 on: September 22, 2019, 02:40:07 AM »
Aron Eisenberg, who played Nog in Deep Space Nine, passed away. :tocry
IYKYK

nachobro

  • Live Más
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2064 on: September 22, 2019, 02:58:15 AM »
oh no, that's awful. rip :'(

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2065 on: September 22, 2019, 03:05:03 AM »
He only ever had one kidney, it failed a few years back, and I assume it did again but it was too much this time.

Considering his role on the show it's kinda surprising when you realize he was 50!

shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2066 on: September 22, 2019, 03:31:35 AM »
Aron Eisenberg, who played Nog in Deep Space Nine, passed away. :tocry

That's a really unfortunate character name.
每天生气

MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2067 on: September 22, 2019, 04:49:20 AM »
rip nog :(
What

MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2068 on: September 22, 2019, 10:40:22 AM »
all that yamok sauce
What

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2069 on: September 29, 2019, 02:19:25 PM »


spoiler (click to show/hide)
[close]

GreatSageEqualOfHeaven

  • Dumbass Monkey
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2070 on: October 02, 2019, 03:43:11 PM »
shaka, when the walls fell

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2071 on: October 03, 2019, 02:06:08 AM »
penis, when the seven appeared

GreatSageEqualOfHeaven

  • Dumbass Monkey
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2072 on: October 03, 2019, 03:22:57 PM »
voyager, when ensign kim never got promoted

MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2073 on: October 04, 2019, 02:12:53 PM »
(Image removed from quote.)

spoiler (click to show/hide)
[close]
Hahahahaah holy fuck
darmok and tamal live at tanegra

 :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol

Also I hated that episode
What

MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2074 on: October 04, 2019, 02:13:28 PM »
Chakotay, when the eagle flew
What

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2075 on: October 05, 2019, 03:25:18 PM »


spoiler (click to show/hide)
CW presents not Star Trek. :neogaf
[close]
« Last Edit: October 05, 2019, 04:47:10 PM by D3RANG3D »

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2076 on: October 05, 2019, 03:27:27 PM »
video not available :lol  what year is this

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2077 on: October 05, 2019, 03:28:17 PM »
Must be a leaf thing works in freedomland.

Occam

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2078 on: October 05, 2019, 04:46:53 PM »
Doesn't look awful, but I can't help being reminded of this:
504

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2079 on: October 05, 2019, 05:15:37 PM »
The Scotty gag is a big childhood favorite of mine. :lol
ὕβρις

MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2080 on: October 06, 2019, 06:42:54 AM »
Its fucking garbage reminds me more of star wars than trek

no surprise there
What

MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2081 on: October 06, 2019, 12:11:46 PM »
the promo for that episode is one of the best considering what actually happens in it:


This video contains content from CBS CID, who has blocked it in your country on copyright grounds.

 :lol

All Star Trek shows are on Netflix here CBS..
What

Tuckers Law

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2082 on: October 06, 2019, 01:31:23 PM »
(Image removed from quote.)

 :brazilcry
Goddamn I just now realized what that picture was showing.  Lol that’s fucking dark, that could almost fall under bad vibes.

toku

  • 𝕩𝕩𝕩
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2083 on: October 22, 2019, 10:15:04 AM »

MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2084 on: October 22, 2019, 10:27:26 AM »
breh picard is rolling in his grave
What

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2085 on: October 22, 2019, 12:32:58 PM »

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: star trek
« Reply #2086 on: October 22, 2019, 01:26:14 PM »
Man, STD really is trash.
dog

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member

GreatSageEqualOfHeaven

  • Dumbass Monkey
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2088 on: October 23, 2019, 02:34:11 PM »


is this one of the STD short that people outside of murica don't get to watch until the next season and CBS remembers them and dumps them all on netflix undeer the trailers category?

Why is Archer slumming it?

MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2089 on: November 12, 2019, 11:48:47 AM »
What

GreatSageEqualOfHeaven

  • Dumbass Monkey
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2090 on: November 12, 2019, 11:58:08 AM »
...but steels heavier than feathers?


Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member

Re: star trek
« Reply #2092 on: November 12, 2019, 01:01:07 PM »


(Image removed from quote.)

I don't get it.

It seems like a bad comedy routine. The guy in it is the guy from Bob's Burgers, an animated show that's endearing without being funny.

MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2093 on: November 13, 2019, 12:05:10 PM »
...but steels heavier than feathers?

(Image removed from quote.)

we need some limmy emotes please
What

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2094 on: November 26, 2019, 03:42:52 AM »
https://deadline.com/2019/11/star-trek-noah-hawley-directing-writing-sequel-jj-abrams-chris-pine-paramount-1202785280/
Quote
Paramount Pictures is in final talks with Noah Hawley to write and direct a Star Trek film. Through his 26 Keys production banner he will produce along with JJ Abrams and his Bad Robot banner. I don’t have too much more to report on the film, but my understanding is Hawley will helm the fourth film in this iteration of the venerable franchise, with the Enterprise crew led by Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, Zoe Saldana, Simon Pegg and Karl Urban.

In addition to his groundbreaking series Legion, Hawley serves as executive producer, writer, director and showrunner on FX’s Emmy-winning limited series Fargo.
Quote
The studio separately is working on a Star Trek spinoff that Quentin Tarantino is eyeing to direct and has been working on with Abrams. This one would likely carry an R rating, with a screenplay by The Revenant scribe Mark L. Smith.

Tasty

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2095 on: November 26, 2019, 09:39:54 AM »
DCEU levels of mismanagement, splintering, rushed productions and franchise overexposure incoming.

spoiler (click to show/hide)
Damn I'm bitter and jaded. :goty
[close]

GreatSageEqualOfHeaven

  • Dumbass Monkey
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2096 on: November 26, 2019, 03:00:51 PM »
I'd actually really like a noah hawley star trek tbh. Legion and Fargo are both way more cerebral than they ever needed to be.
It'd be more likely to have, you know, character driven drama and reflections on why they're doing what they're doing.

And less, you know, gun fu with phasers while beastie boys sabotage plays in the background.

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: star trek
« Reply #2097 on: November 26, 2019, 04:25:07 PM »
It's from a webisode, not the main TV series.
dog

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2098 on: November 26, 2019, 05:46:49 PM »
Trek - the milk frontier
IYKYK

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2099 on: November 26, 2019, 05:47:42 PM »
It's from a webisode, not the main TV series.

Doesn't matter
IYKYK