I only jerk off to Garfield cartoons, I think this is considered normal.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Tweet error (does not exist)
Quote from: Kara on May 19, 2019, 11:12:30 AMQuote from: VomKriege on May 19, 2019, 10:42:12 AMAs to Mandark question I guess the answer is "designer's intent" really. Most games are tests of wits or skill for one, and sometimes difficulty is a core pillar of the experience one way or the other. I don't know why developers should settle for that if they don't want too when designing hard, less approachable games carries its own handicap with regards to commercial appeal.Because they aren't artists grappling with The Big Stuff (TM), they're manufacturers of mass media.I'm not sure what games potentially classify as is pertinent to that debate really ? I don't think it's too iconoclast to say that most solitaire / one player games are generally meant as a challenge (achieve victory conditions under whatever set of arbitrary rules and conditions were designed) involving luck, skill, practice or wits. I don't think you can downsize rules or the challenge indefinitely to accommodate everyone without breaking many game designs and diluting their whole raison d'être to nothing.And I would say that difficulty for videogames can be a "narrative" tool as well (regardless of how artful you would consider the "story" or "propos").Games are entertainment, non-essential and so plentiful in every form and difficulty for every sort of public that I don't really understand why From should have to include an easy mode, just like I wouldn't expect a 6 year old kid to be able to beat and enjoy Korsun Pocket.
Quote from: VomKriege on May 19, 2019, 10:42:12 AMAs to Mandark question I guess the answer is "designer's intent" really. Most games are tests of wits or skill for one, and sometimes difficulty is a core pillar of the experience one way or the other. I don't know why developers should settle for that if they don't want too when designing hard, less approachable games carries its own handicap with regards to commercial appeal.Because they aren't artists grappling with The Big Stuff (TM), they're manufacturers of mass media.
As to Mandark question I guess the answer is "designer's intent" really. Most games are tests of wits or skill for one, and sometimes difficulty is a core pillar of the experience one way or the other. I don't know why developers should settle for that if they don't want too when designing hard, less approachable games carries its own handicap with regards to commercial appeal.
Milkshakes unnecessarily exploit animals. We should throw rotten tomatoes at reactionaries instead
SARGON SAID PLANTS FEEL PAIN HAHAHAHAA https://t.co/KtB62aTwFr— David ???? ?? (@discordspies) May 19, 2019
SARGON SAID PLANTS FEEL PAIN HAHAHAHAA https://t.co/KtB62aTwFr
A milkshake recipe you can throw together in seconds. https://t.co/IKnA35GdwN— The Guardian (@guardian) May 20, 2019
A milkshake recipe you can throw together in seconds. https://t.co/IKnA35GdwN
Tweet error (does not exist)https://twitter.com/SamHarrisOrg/status/1130163073082224640
Lots of people up in arms about the new menace of milkshake-throwing, but the solution is very simple: just invite the milkshake-throwers to Question Time, or the Oxford Union, and defeat them in a robust debate in the marketplace of ideas— Chris Applegate (@chrisapplegate) May 20, 2019
Lots of people up in arms about the new menace of milkshake-throwing, but the solution is very simple: just invite the milkshake-throwers to Question Time, or the Oxford Union, and defeat them in a robust debate in the marketplace of ideas
But the intent of the milkshakes is good, kind of like when the US bombed that medications factory in Africa. So it's excusable— Classical Conservative (call me a lefty I sue) (@BilboBobgans) May 23, 2019
But the intent of the milkshakes is good, kind of like when the US bombed that medications factory in Africa. So it's excusable
"medications factory" instead of "pharmaceuticals plant"
Too lazy to look this up, but I'd drop a fiver on Sam Harris condoning actual assassinations in the so-called War on Terror, either outright or through some tedious argument about exigent circumstances demanding situational morals.
The only way to rule out collateral damage would be to refuse to fight wars under any circumstances. As a foreign policy, this would leave us with something like the absolute pacifism of Gandhi. While pacifism in this form can constitute a direct confrontation with injustice (and requires considerable bravery), it is only applicable to a limited range of human conflicts. Where it is not applicable, it is seems flagrantly immoral. We would do well to reflect on Gandhi’s remedy for the Holocaust: he believed that the Jews should have committed mass suicide, because this “would have aroused the world and the people of Germany to Hitler’s violence.” We might wonder what a world full of pacifists would have done once it had grown “aroused”—commit suicide as well? There seems no question that if all the good people in the world adopted Gandhi’s ethics, the thugs would inherit the earth.So we can now ask, if we are willing to act in a way that guarantees the misery and death of some considerable number of innocent children, why spare the rod with known terrorists?
Leftist logic:- Milk is racist- Dumping milkshakes on white people is not racist— Stefan Molyneux, MA (@StefanMolyneux) May 22, 2019https://twitter.com/StefanMolyneux/status/1131271997357469696nice, gottem
Leftist logic:- Milk is racist- Dumping milkshakes on white people is not racist— Stefan Molyneux, MA (@StefanMolyneux) May 22, 2019
Leftist logic:- Milk is racist- Dumping milkshakes on white people is not racist
Quote from: shosta on May 22, 2019, 09:29:01 PMLeftist logic:- Milk is racist- Dumping milkshakes on white people is not racist— Stefan Molyneux, MA (@StefanMolyneux) May 22, 2019https://twitter.com/StefanMolyneux/status/1131271997357469696nice, gottemwouldn't it be more logical:- alt-rights love milk- let's feed them some milk?
Tweet error (does not exist)https://twitter.com/SamHarrisOrg/status/1131263791415595009
Quote from: Esch on May 22, 2019, 08:17:39 PMTweet error (does not exist)https://twitter.com/SamHarrisOrg/status/1131263791415595009 how dowhat wouldn'ti don't seebut that doesn't
Fun debate in Bournemouth???So good to see you again @MDeLaBroc @WarPlanPurple ??? pic.twitter.com/v1tV5opWt9— Alice Grant (@missalicegrant) May 19, 2019
Fun debate in Bournemouth???So good to see you again @MDeLaBroc @WarPlanPurple ??? pic.twitter.com/v1tV5opWt9
Far from being ‘paid support’ as their desperate critics suggest, the Grants are both highly intelligent Brexiteers
I don't get what the "revelation" is supposed to be?QuoteFar from being ‘paid support’ as their desperate critics suggest, the Grants are both highly intelligent Brexiteersoh...okay?
Is this the same Sergeant McNaughton who was tried for the attempted murder of an unarmed civilian in Armagh in 1974? pic.twitter.com/RN2Hruka4Z— Liam Hogan (@Limerick1914) May 24, 2019
Is this the same Sergeant McNaughton who was tried for the attempted murder of an unarmed civilian in Armagh in 1974? pic.twitter.com/RN2Hruka4Z
Sergeant MacNaughton alleged that the unarmed man was shot while attempting to escape, while the man claimed he was ordered by MacNaughton to climb over a fence to the flank of the patrol and was shot by him when he did so.MacNaughton – who was in his mid-30s at the time – was found not guilty of both charges by the Belfast City Commission on September 5, 1974.The judge ruled that the evidence of the civilian was "unsatisfactory and inconsistent in certain details", whereas the evidence of the accused and other soldiers "fitted together and was not mutually contradictory".
Quote from: Kara on May 24, 2019, 06:36:05 PMBe sure to show your trad wife all your books, buddy!Being able to put all that shit aside by being Saved by the Lord
Be sure to show your trad wife all your books, buddy!
Speaking of right sex pathologies, RIP PUA. Killed by Denmark or whatever post-Viking culture it was that owned you so hard with the social fascist welfare state that you broke kayfabe to mewl about it.(Image removed from quote.)Be sure to show your trad wife all your books, buddy!
what if the masturbation, oral sex, anal sex and etc. is with your married wife? wouldn't that be sexual activity while married? this is too confusing
I don't even think a Dawkins type would say religion.
Trademark AdvicePureKino - this is Mehow's own approach to attraction. According to him, all you need to attract a woman is influential kinesthetics. Composing of verbal prowess (words) and a lot of touching (kino).Value Velocity - this is a concept that Mehow developed based on his own experience. It states that as long as the topic you are talking to a woman with has value, it would take less than 10 seconds for attraction to set in.Solo winging - Mehow firmly believes that though having a wingman can sometimes be valuable, solo winging can get you much better results.The Microloop
Solo GameAKA Solo Sarging, Solo Winging Quick Definition: When a PUA is out and picking up girls by himself, without any friends…
Value Velocity - this is a concept that Mehow developed based on his own experience. It states that as long as the topic you are talking to a woman with has value, it would take less than 10 seconds for attraction to set in
Concepts and theories taught by Adam include:Entourage game in which being surrounded by many beautiful women will make you appear attractive and, in turn, allow you to attract other desirable women.One way which Adam explains attraction is by using this formula which represents events leading to someone being attracted to you if they had not been at first site:(C-R) + Q + S = AC = ComfortR = RapportQ = QualificationS = Sexual EscalationA = Attraction
Don�t trust pollsTrust /pol/— Stefan Molyneux, MA (@StefanMolyneux) May 21, 2019
Don�t trust pollsTrust /pol/
(Image removed from quote.)
If you've been following my work for a while, you'll notice I've been warning up to faith in God over the years, especially the past year. This is due to witnessing the growth of evil in society, my personal experiences with unbridled hedonism, and my sister's death. This reached a climax when I received a message while on mushrooms which cemented that faith further, an experience which I will share in the future after I'm done processing it.
Many comments from men said how the black pill was a gateway to the God pill. There seems to be a progression:Blue pill: Ignorance, denial of natureRed pill: Truth through materialism (muscles, women, money, status)Black pill: Acceptance of one's powerlessness, withdrawal from materialist societyGod pill: Submission to God's will
The God pill does feel like the final destination, where life becomes about asking Him for help and performing His will in a way that embraces good.
