Author Topic: US Politics Thread |OT| SAD TRUMP  (Read 5443720 times)

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Occam

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51240 on: February 04, 2020, 09:35:46 PM »
Notice how Trump keeps using that Mussolini pose?

504

EightBitNate

  • I don’t wanna be horny anymore, I wanna be happy
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51241 on: February 04, 2020, 09:36:20 PM »

Occam

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51242 on: February 04, 2020, 09:38:55 PM »
Can't listen to Trump, his voice makes me sick.
504

Trent Dole

  • the sharpest tool in the shed
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51243 on: February 04, 2020, 09:45:28 PM »
Lol watching any SotU ever
Hi

Cauliflower Of Love

  • I found my bearings, they were in the race
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51244 on: February 04, 2020, 09:47:23 PM »
Yo, this guy.

:lol

Cauliflower Of Love

  • I found my bearings, they were in the race
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51245 on: February 04, 2020, 09:51:40 PM »
"thank you for your devotion to our country"


rush limbaugh


A plug during SOTU, and a medal of freedom.

:rofl

shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51246 on: February 04, 2020, 09:52:21 PM »
LMFAOOOOOOOOO
每天生气

Cauliflower Of Love

  • I found my bearings, they were in the race
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51247 on: February 04, 2020, 09:58:25 PM »
One trillion tree initiative to save the planet.

:snoop

OnlyRegret

  • <<SALVATION!>>
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51248 on: February 04, 2020, 10:02:45 PM »
if i recall correctly the streets of sacramento are full of anti vaxxers  so you may have encountered slight resistance!

FTFY.

anti vaxxers
resistance

lmao just sneeze on them


benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51249 on: February 04, 2020, 10:03:15 PM »
Chris Matthews:

"Bernie went down from 45%(2016) to 25% tonight and pete went from nothing to 27%
So I somehow got Sanders, Mayor Pete and Chris Matthews all in one night?

OnlyRegret

  • <<SALVATION!>>
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51250 on: February 04, 2020, 10:04:43 PM »
smh, hillary at 0 right now
so much for madame presidente

Occam

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51251 on: February 04, 2020, 10:06:48 PM »
"Trump touts his economy as the best ever. The data doesn’t show that."
(WaPo headline)
LOL
504

Cauliflower Of Love

  • I found my bearings, they were in the race
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51252 on: February 04, 2020, 10:09:16 PM »
That segue between religion and guns.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51253 on: February 04, 2020, 10:09:22 PM »
I nearly unblocked cindi but I’m glad I didn’t based on what I’m seeing itt
oh, so you need someone to do something like this?
I'm never voting for a Republican ever again after this and as much as I disagree/dislike the Democrats on many issues (their cock sucking of Biden and "moderates" for one, their war tendencies that are just as hawkish as the GOP for two) they really are the better of the two parties.

I'm so far away from the gun issue it's not even on my mind anymore. America is at stake.
Republicans are traitors. Vote every R out.
God, today reminds me why I HATE Democrats. This entire PLEASE VOTE DEMOCRAT NO MATTER WHAT. I have done that my entire life. What has improved because of it? Jack SHIT. Democrats can say republicans are cultish all they want talking about DESTROYING OUR DemoCRaCy while always guilt tripping people into voting the way they feel. What democracy? Oh the democracy that guilt trips you for not wanting to vote for some no name fuck that helped delay polling results, invested in the voting app that failed, and is now mysteriously in the lead.

Between the impeachment, the state of the union, Buttigieg, delaying Iowa I am BEYOND stressed today and on the verge of a meltdown. I want to throw my phone on the GODDAMN CONCRETE.

Cauliflower Of Love

  • I found my bearings, they were in the race
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51254 on: February 04, 2020, 10:14:17 PM »
What the fuck is wrong with this guy.

jfc

Cauliflower Of Love

  • I found my bearings, they were in the race
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51255 on: February 04, 2020, 10:20:09 PM »
Fuck this asshole and tv show shit.

Imagine how the widow feels right now.


What a peice of shit.

Cauliflower Of Love

  • I found my bearings, they were in the race
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51256 on: February 04, 2020, 10:26:37 PM »
Nancy ripping up the speech.

:rofl

shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51257 on: February 04, 2020, 10:40:41 PM »
Imagine how many texts you'd get during the state of the union if you sign up for that shit :jeanluc


It was just these three and then they asked me for more money :beli
每天生气

Skullfuckers Anonymous

  • Will hunt bullies for fruit baskets. PM for details.
  • Senior Member

HaughtyFrank

  • Haughty and a little naughty
  • Senior Member

Cauliflower Of Love

  • I found my bearings, they were in the race
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51260 on: February 04, 2020, 10:47:39 PM »
Bernie response


benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51261 on: February 04, 2020, 11:08:48 PM »
What have Democrats ever done for you? I don't know - your most important issues seem to be gun rights and Catholicism
Coincidentally, they're the only major party to ever nominate Catholics for President. (Al Smith, John Kennedy, John Kerry. They'll make it four if they nominate Joe Biden.)

team filler

  • filler
  • filler
*****

Tripon

  • Teach by day, Sleep by night
  • Senior Member

team filler

  • filler
  • filler
*****

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51265 on: February 04, 2020, 11:20:35 PM »
https://theoutline.com/post/8636/acronym-shadow-iowa-caucus-results-disaster
Quote
Acronym, as the group’s founder and CEO Tara McGowan has told seemingly any reporter who would listen in the last year, was supposed to shake up Democratic politics. Faced with Republican opponents that now actually know how to campaign on social media, the non-profit digital strategy organization intended to offer an effective Democratic countermeasure, guided by digitally savvy hands of the Obama 2012 and Clinton 2016 campaigns.

After the disastrous Iowa Caucus on Monday, it’s hard to imagine that anyone is buying this story now. A faulty smartphone app, developed by the Acronym subsidiary “Shadow,” failed to correctly tabulate Iowa caucus votes. Though the Iowa Democratic Party says the vote counts are unaffected, the confusion has given ailing campaigns room to maneuver that they otherwise wouldn’t have had. Pete Buttigieg took the opportunity to declare victory, apparently based on nothing more than a gut feeling. Joe Biden, who has been slipping in polls for the past couple weeks, has asked for the actual votes to be invalidated.

According to an Acronym staffer, who spoke under condition of anonymity because of a non-disclosure agreement, Acronym is “far and away the most disorganized place I've ever been a part of.”
Quote
Launched ahead of the 2018 midterms, Acronym was described initially as a “digital-first startup” (in the words of Axios), co-founded by McGowan and Michael Dubin, the founder of the men’s grooming company Dollar Shave Club whom you might recognize from their ads. McGowan, who previously worked as the digital director of the Obama and Clinton-affiliated Super PAC Priorities USA Action, was able to bring in money for Acronym’s affiliated political action committee Pacronym from a variety of well-known wealthy Democratic funders, including the billionaires George Soros and Marsha Laufer.

Acronym’s actual headcount is difficult to determine because of the hiring spree the company has been on in the last few months. In November, McGowan told the Times that Acronym and Pacronym had raised 40 percent of a planned $75 million, with the goal of deploying that money on anti-Trump advertising in five key battleground states: North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Arizona, an effort called “Four is Enough" (based on the logic that only four of these five states are required to win a national election).

What distinguishes Acronym, McGowan told the Times, is the flexibility offered by its 501(c)(4) “dark money structure” — beyond the obvious advantages of being able to collect virtually unlimited dollars with no required disclosures. A flattering profile (“An A student with an attitude”) of McGowan that appeared on Ozy.com last September described Acronym as having “a web of for-profit companies beneath it,” one of which was “a political tech company with a peer-to-peer texting product” — Shadow.

Although this structure makes it seem that Acronym has the ability to reinvest whatever profits it makes, the Acronym staffer said it manifested as organizational chaos.

“They call it a ‘startup environment’ as an explanation for why no one knows what's happening,” the staffer said.
Quote
McGowan’s theory of how digital campaigning works — churning out content for mass reach on social media — has gotten significant media play. In two  separate  Times articles published within a week of each other this past November, McGowan explained that the Democrats and their donors needed to get smart about digital. “We don’t need to spread lies or play to people’s insecurities to win, we just need to compete and get our message to voters every single day where they get their information,” she told the Times on November 1. “Right now, we’re not even on the field.”

“Trump has upped the ante by spending more than any candidate this early in a general election campaign,” she told the Times three days later, “and right now our side is simply not on the field.”

As described by the Acronym staffer, McGowan and Acronym were hardly competing on the field she described. Staffers hired to churn out digital content sat in a room for at least a week, given no direction about what to do. There wasn’t a clear understanding about what the content strategy was supposed to achieve.
Quote
These missteps are also not limited to ideas being badly executed — the problem is that the ideas were bad in the first place. A key project McGowan announced in a glossy Bloomberg Businessweek  profile in November was the launch of Courier Newsroom, a center-left content network designed to mimic the aesthetics of local news sites, which McGowan cheerfully spun as a replacement for actual local news.

As a digital strategy firm, Acronym’s idea of how to win the digital “war” against Donald Trump in 2020 also reflects this blinkered thinking. Much like Hillary Clinton’s doomed 2016 effort to campaign against “Dangerous Donald” — and to focus messaging on why Trump is a uniquely bad guy — McGowan (whom the staffer describes has an aggressive hand in Acronym’s content production) told the Times that Democrats must tell “a powerful, true, cohesive story about why this guy is dangerous.”

And whatever special alchemy to reach people that Acronym claims to possess, a Tuesday Daily Beast investigation notes, they don’t appear to have actually tried to tell that “powerful” story: the group reportedly only disbursed about $200,000 of the $1 million they had promised to spend on impeachment advertising against Trump.

TakingBackSunday

  • Banana Grabber
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51266 on: February 04, 2020, 11:20:39 PM »
this country is fucked
püp

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51267 on: February 04, 2020, 11:22:29 PM »

kingv

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51268 on: February 04, 2020, 11:24:42 PM »
It's also an absolute monarchy (another word for fascist dictatorship) and the only way I can watch porn is through VPN's.

Your point?

That just makes it hotter tbh.

Cauliflower Of Love

  • I found my bearings, they were in the race
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51269 on: February 04, 2020, 11:32:56 PM »
How does michael steel sound so clear with trumps balls in his mouth?

remy

  • my hog is small but it is mighty
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51270 on: February 04, 2020, 11:58:23 PM »
Pelosi ripping up the speech was epic and hot af.
I used that move to get elected school captain in the 6th grade

thisismyusername

  • GunOn™! Apply directly to forehead!
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51271 on: February 05, 2020, 12:08:57 AM »
Pelosi ripping up the speech was epic and hot af.




 ::) Can't wait for you and other DNC followers to meme this for the next three weeks.

Skullfuckers Anonymous

  • Will hunt bullies for fruit baskets. PM for details.
  • Senior Member

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51273 on: February 05, 2020, 12:42:34 AM »
to take this out of Cindi's non-politics focused thread a bit, though maybe it should go in wank dad instead
I've not exactly hidden that Sanders has been my preferred candidate for two cycles now. :doge
wut
I mean of The Party candidates I guess?

Ooo

I assumed that you just enjoyed watching everything from a detached point of view.

Did you happen to watch the Reason debate featuring Richard Wolff? He was weirdly angry the whole time and the libertarian debating him reminded me of you.
Well, I mean, I do. But I do find little events and pieces to root for. It's like in the NBA, I support whoever is against the Lakers. Or Kevin Durant. Or I'm for Mike Budenholzer teams. Or Billups when he got traded, or Andre if he does.

No, I haven't watched or even looked at much reason content lately. Been focused on history stuff more. Don't really like libertarian debates either as they're kinda pure cringe unless they transcend it into quality epic cringe. But I do like watching people get angry so I might poke around through it. Also to find out why this guy reminds of me I guess.

edit: found the debate, "capitalism vs. socialism", the top comment was this:
Quote
Google pay 350$ reliably my last pay check was $45000 working 9 hours out of consistently on the web. My increasingly youthful kinfolk mate has been averaging 19k all through continuous months and he works around 24 hours reliably. I can’t trust in howdirect it was once I attempted it out.This is my essential concern.for more info visit any tab this site Thanks a lot …………. Click The Site
« Last Edit: February 05, 2020, 12:50:31 AM by benjipwns »

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51274 on: February 05, 2020, 12:42:44 AM »

What have Democrats ever done for you? I don't know - your most important issues seem to be gun rights and Catholicism

Anti-War and anti-American interventionism/imperialism
Drug war
Student loans
Corporate money in politics
Healthcare

Guns used to be important. They still are, but I'm at a point where I no longer care and I've reverted to my bread and butter: Anti-War, drug war, healthcare, corruption.

Democrats are bad on literally all of the issues I just listed. I voted third party in 2012 to protest Obama because of it. When obama was campaigning people made excuses for his administrations having terrorist lists and kill lists that killed innocent people. Mandark and I fought over it heavily. The iraq war is the main way I got into politics, something many Democrats defended once Obama was president despite protesting while Bush was in office. This is a big reason I supported Tulsi before she proved herself non-viable and before I learned her secret Imperialism.

Democrats do good things, but most of it is muddy. You mention sanctuary states but Obama administration deported an insane amount of immigrants.

For the issues I've cared about Democrats have always been lesser than shit. ACA was a good step forward but I'm currently paying nearly 300 dollars a month for a plan with a 6k deductible. Even Obama's main legacy is shit.

So when Democrats started to rally against guns during a time when they were calling the current administration Nazi's it was pretty easy to drop them.

On all the issues I listed Democrats have refused to budge on the national level because they benefit from the money from big pharma and and wars. The democrats have  had a mentality that is utterly stuck in the status quo. Any reason I vote for democrats now, unless they prove themselves to actually change as a party, is only s temporary truce between the two of us.

I've disliked democrats since at least 2009 or 2010 and haven't identified as one since 2009.
IYKYK

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51275 on: February 05, 2020, 12:55:19 AM »
I'll grant that maybe my perception of democrats is because I've lived in red states my whole life besides a short stint in NY. I have no idea what state democrat governance is even like to live under.

Edit: and the most infuriating thing about the democrats is how they always offer change while saying they'll do jack shit to change anything. Democrats always go for symptoms. They never really want to fix the issue wholesale because then that's one less reason to vote for them. Look at Biden, Klobuchar, Buttigieg. They embody all of this.

I honestly cannot wait to leave Texas and finally get to register myself with a big, fat, I next to it.
« Last Edit: February 05, 2020, 01:05:44 AM by Cindi Mayweather »
IYKYK

team filler

  • filler
  • filler
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51276 on: February 05, 2020, 01:08:13 AM »
*****

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51277 on: February 05, 2020, 01:16:02 AM »
Quote
A group of prominent Upstate Republicans is preparing to launch a wide-scale effort this week to encourage GOP voters across South Carolina to vote for U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders in the Feb. 29 Democratic primary, The Post and Courier has learned.
:gddr5

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51278 on: February 05, 2020, 01:20:41 AM »
https://www.theverge.com/2020/2/4/21122737/iowa-democractic-caucus-voting-app-android-testfairy-screenshots-app-store
Quote
The New York Times reported that many precinct chiefs had trouble simply downloading the app, and Motherboard’s screenshots give hints as to why that might be. The app was not deployed through traditional app stores or even sideloaded using an enterprise certificate. Instead, it was deployed through mobile testing platforms, including Apple’s TestFlight and a similar service that services both iOS and Android called TestFairy. Both platforms are for apps that are not yet finalized.

...

The screenshot from Motherboard also shows that the app was distributed using the TestFairy platform’s free tier and not its enterprise one. That means Shadow didn’t even pony up for the TestFairy plan that comes with single sign-on authentication, unlimited data retention, and end-to-end encryption. Instead, it looks like the company used the version of TestFairy anyone can try for free, which deletes any app data after 30 days and limits the number of test users that can access the app to 200.
:dead

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51279 on: February 05, 2020, 01:26:49 AM »
And my republican stint was a reaction to DEMOCRATS.

If your beliefs flipped from socialist to reactionary just because you were mad at Democrats, that might say more about you than it does about them.

Transhuman

  • youtu.be/KCVCmGPgJS0
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51280 on: February 05, 2020, 04:38:47 AM »






Who's this Bernie fella people keep talking about?

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51281 on: February 05, 2020, 06:31:12 AM »
Enterily tangential, but 70k$ to develop an app (largely useless and superfluous as it may be) up to the level of security and reliability you would expect sounds... Way too cheap ? And a sign it was an afterthought and mostly a fluff contract to shuffle some favors around.

Maybe I don't have a good grasp on that economy but that covers a month of work for 20 people at best ?
ὕβρις

BIONIC

  • Virgo. Live Music. The Office. Tacos. Fur mom. True crime junkie. INTJ.
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51282 on: February 05, 2020, 06:34:20 AM »
All you need is a good grasp on the like economy :pimp
Margs

MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51283 on: February 05, 2020, 08:13:26 AM »
Secret footage of Great Rumbler

What

thisismyusername

  • GunOn™! Apply directly to forehead!
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51284 on: February 05, 2020, 08:21:06 AM »
No doxxing. :wag :wag :wag

ToxicAdam

  • captain of my capsized ship
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51285 on: February 05, 2020, 08:25:00 AM »
Pelosi ripping up the speech was epic and hot af.

I never expected you to be a YAAAS QUEEN-type.


thisismyusername

  • GunOn™! Apply directly to forehead!
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51286 on: February 05, 2020, 08:40:56 AM »

Brehvolution

  • Until at last, I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin upon the mountainside.
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51287 on: February 05, 2020, 09:07:44 AM »
I'm curious to see what the app wanted access to on android phones. I'm sure it was the same for iPhones, but ios doesn't show what the app wants access to.
©ZH

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51288 on: February 05, 2020, 09:08:02 AM »
Quote
A group of prominent Upstate Republicans is preparing to launch a wide-scale effort this week to encourage GOP voters across South Carolina to vote for U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders in the Feb. 29 Democratic primary, The Post and Courier has learned.
:gddr5

https://www.twitter.com/wikileaks/status/964971362531074048
©@©™

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51289 on: February 05, 2020, 09:15:01 AM »
Secret footage of Great Rumbler

(Image removed from quote.)

Only I can defeat Trump in November.
dog

BIONIC

  • Virgo. Live Music. The Office. Tacos. Fur mom. True crime junkie. INTJ.
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51290 on: February 05, 2020, 09:27:26 AM »
Margs

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51291 on: February 05, 2020, 09:36:21 AM »
Iowa een bom zal droppen !
ὕβρις

Cauliflower Of Love

  • I found my bearings, they were in the race
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51292 on: February 05, 2020, 10:18:08 AM »
Imagine if it was team bernie fucking with the shadwo app reporting.

ToxicAdam

  • captain of my capsized ship
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51293 on: February 05, 2020, 10:43:25 AM »
What makes it all more comical is when you factor in the money (and time) these campaigns spent in Iowa for the potential publicity that a win would create. They spent 68 million in ads alone, so you can conservatively estimate that they spent about 100 million over the past 6 months.

Transhuman

  • youtu.be/KCVCmGPgJS0
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51294 on: February 05, 2020, 10:56:05 AM »
Imagine if it was team bernie fucking with the shadow app reporting.

After an unreleased (to the public) poll that less than 48 hours earlier said he would be the clear frontrunner?

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51295 on: February 05, 2020, 11:39:55 AM »
What makes it all more comical is when you factor in the money (and time) these campaigns spent in Iowa for the potential publicity that a win would create. They spent 68 million in ads alone, so you can conservatively estimate that they spent about 100 million over the past 6 months.

Saw a tweet thread explaining that despite the huge amount of money being poured into politics, the incentives aren't there for developing tech tools for the long term (except those that facilitate campaign donations in compliance with the FEC, like ActBlue).

$70k to make an app from scratch and have its first actual use be the Iowa caucuses is... not great.

TakingBackSunday

  • Banana Grabber
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51296 on: February 05, 2020, 12:07:35 PM »
sounds like every fucking bullshit entrepreneurship douchebag that tries to sell his ideas at every tech meetup in Nashville

of course the people that worked for on this were all desperate bootcamp grads wanting their first gig
püp

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51297 on: February 05, 2020, 12:08:22 PM »
Enterily tangential, but 70k$ to develop an app (largely useless and superfluous as it may be) up to the level of security and reliability you would expect sounds... Way too cheap ? And a sign it was an afterthought and mostly a fluff contract to shuffle some favors around.

Maybe I don't have a good grasp on that economy but that covers a month of work for 20 people at best ?

That would be what my company would charge for me + a one more junior dev for a single month lol.

I was going off a very conservative estimate of total shit wages but yeah I figured.
ὕβρις

Cauliflower Of Love

  • I found my bearings, they were in the race
  • Senior Member

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: US Politics Thread |OT| #iowasucks
« Reply #51299 on: February 05, 2020, 12:38:26 PM »
Enterily tangential, but 70k$ to develop an app (largely useless and superfluous as it may be) up to the level of security and reliability you would expect sounds... Way too cheap ? And a sign it was an afterthought and mostly a fluff contract to shuffle some favors around.

Maybe I don't have a good grasp on that economy but that covers a month of work for 20 people at best ?

That would be what my company would charge for me + a one more junior dev for a single month lol.

How much for just the junior dev and a couple of people with no experience or qualifications or maybe just the janitor? Get back to me at joemolotov@peteforamerica.com
©@©™