What I’m saying is this. Aziz did nothing criminal. Equating his behavior with a Weinstein or calling him a sexual predator, or whatever just seems extra.
There are two sides to every story, by Aziz Ansaris own words he though it was consensual. From my reading of her story it was consensual, if boorish and gross. I’m not going to get morally indignant over some guy acting like an asshole on a date one time. This isn’t like Henry Weinstein where a slew of women came out a month later saying “oh yeah, Aziz is a serial date rapist”.
NOBODY IS EQUATING HIS BEHAVIOR WITH WEINSTEIN'S.
NOBODY IS CALLING FOR HIM TO BE ARRESTED.
You're bringing this stuff up, not other people, so you can minimize what he did. You're eliding big parts of her story, saying there are "two sides" when he didn't dispute a single thing from her account, using euphemisms like "boorish" to describe someone who tried to undo a woman's pants after she told him no, and when this story first came out you pretended not to understand the entire concept of nonverbal cues.
Ansari has suffered no consequences other than some public embarrassment. Why is it so important for you to defend what he did?