Ok, since you are dumb as a rock, I will explain what I inferred with my examples.
You made an appeal to popularity. He is popular therefore what he is saying must have merit. That is demonstrably false, as all sorts of crazy ideas and cult leaders have amassed large numbers of followers. I know you are trying to be your best to be like your toilet daddy and be a contrarian, but surely you will not argue that there might be something to Hitler's ideas because he was immensely popular?
Second, you made another fallacious argument, and that is an appeal to authority. You mentioned how Peterson is a professor, therefore we should listen to him. That's a roundabout way of you saying that he is smarter than you, therefore you concede to his expertise. Only problem is that he is a doctor in psychology, not in social engineering, and his expertise in that area is overstated. That's kind of like saying that Ben Carson is a great presidential candidate or a great secretary of HUD because he was a brilliant surgeon.