Holy shit
I watched this and it's kind of a silly disingenuous read of a specific moment
people laugh for a multitude of reasons and it's not possible to intuit the precise meaning of one moment like this unless the person tells you what was going through their head in their own words (and even then, if you insist on not believing them then literally nothing could convince you)
he could've been thinking "ah geeze I've been asked this exact question before and now I have to go through this again"
could've been thinking "ah man this guy is going to get me in trouble here by raising this idea which is kind of a strawman"
there is a lot of talk about how the left constantly gives the most uncharitable read of anyone's statements, e.g. look at the Lindsay Ellis situation where she got in huge trouble for making a mild comparison between two random kids' media, Raya and Avatar, a year ago and nobody let her live it down, and in defending herself went on to say they are similar "if you squint" which led people to say HOLY SHIT SHE'S BLATANTLY MAKING AN ASIANS HAVE SLANTY EYES REFERENCE, WHAT A HORRIBLE PERSON
this hyper-focus on a nerdy weirdo laughing nervously during an interview has the same vibes
if there's something worth saying for/against then actually say it, and don't get into deep reads on whether kamala's eye twitched offensively or whatever