Author Topic: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo  (Read 609634 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #1980 on: July 31, 2019, 02:55:52 AM »
forum is messing up my formatting


EDIT: Think I fixed it, idk why it happens has for the last 10 years, demi pls.
« Last Edit: July 31, 2019, 03:14:10 AM by Momo »

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #1981 on: July 31, 2019, 03:02:52 AM »
a lot of what you objected to in that thread was calling him on his bullshit directly, but you weren't comfortable with those aspects being called bullshit, because either you agreed with it, or the conflict lines reminded you too much of left/right politics to which you're averse.

receipts

I think a lot of you don't give Peterson credit when he makes sense and I think some of you are unwilling to call him out for the taking of wisdom from fairy tales bullshit, yes he derives at decent conclusion most of the time, but the source is fucking Hansel and Gretel or bible shit.


Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #1982 on: July 31, 2019, 03:11:45 AM »
That post is saying 'attack his methodology not his conclusions' when the conclusions are obvious shit like 'work hard, clean your room' etc, specifically cause he derives it from 'in the bible there was a story once about a man making wine from a grape he put so much effort into it and cleaned up later'. What did you think I was saying? This is part of the issue I have, why do you guys assume it's adversarial when it's obviously not.

shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #1983 on: July 31, 2019, 03:12:35 AM »
Leave Momo alone, you fucking coward!
每天生气

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #1984 on: July 31, 2019, 03:18:18 AM »
That post is saying 'attack his methodology not his conclusions' when the conclusions are obvious shit like 'work hard, clean your room' etc

Click the link to see your own quote in context, then come back and tell me people were attacking his bland, self-help instructions.

spoiler (click to show/hide)
Narrator: They were not, they were clowning him for his nonsense about Frozen.
[close]

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #1985 on: July 31, 2019, 03:18:32 AM »
The only defense I can think of I've ever offered JP and friends is how disingenuous the media are about them, which stems from the same place.

shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #1986 on: July 31, 2019, 03:19:24 AM »
Quote from: Shostakovich
Quote from: Oblivion
Shos, I gotta say, I'm a bit disappointed with you. I totally expect someone like etiloiate to dismiss such an article, but not you.
Then you've misread me completely. I side with etiolate most of the time he posts.
oh my god
每天生气

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #1987 on: July 31, 2019, 03:19:26 AM »
The only defense I can think of I've ever offered JP and friends is how disingenuous the media are about them, which stems from the same place.

the same thing you've done for alex jones, and when I asked for receipts you said "wow I'm so wounded you wouldn't just take my word for it but give me a couple days" then did nothing

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #1988 on: July 31, 2019, 03:19:40 AM »
I tried, the post links to my profile. Tbh I dont remember much of this  :trumps

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #1989 on: July 31, 2019, 03:22:08 AM »
The quote about peterson links to the original wank dad thread. The quote about alex jones is from a PM, cause you decided you wanted to shift the discussion out of public for whatever reason.

KEEP UP

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #1990 on: July 31, 2019, 03:22:21 AM »
The only defense I can think of I've ever offered JP and friends is how disingenuous the media are about them, which stems from the same place.

the same thing you've done for alex jones, and when I asked for receipts you said "wow I'm so wounded you wouldn't just take my word for it but give me a couple days" then did nothing
If I ever disengage it's because i feel it's pointless and adversarial, I've gone back and forth for pages with Boredfrom and others, where I figure out i'm wrong or both of us moved positions slightly but sometimes I dont feel it's worth my time.  I'm consistent when calling out media sources I read for dumb-assery btw. 

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #1991 on: July 31, 2019, 03:23:30 AM »
You disengaged cause you said something that wasn't true and got called on it.

shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #1992 on: July 31, 2019, 03:25:01 AM »
Quote from: Mandark
Quote from: Shostakovich
Ok, Mandark. You caught me. I hate women.
you keep bringing in stuff that i haven't said

i do think you resent feminists (and this was established outside this thread) tho

Quote from: Mandark
You do resent feminists

Fuck you Mandark, I'm mad all over again :rage :rage :rage

After that post, Etiolate and I started exchanging messages about how much we hate you :maf
每天生气

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #1993 on: July 31, 2019, 03:25:30 AM »
I'm consistent when calling out media sources I read for dumb-assery btw.

I don't see why you need to be so closed-minded and dismissive of media sources you disagree with, instead of seeing their point of view and potentially re-examining assumptions on your own side?

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #1994 on: July 31, 2019, 03:26:20 AM »
The quote about peterson links to the original wank dad thread. The quote about alex jones is from a PM, cause you decided you wanted to shift the discussion out of public for whatever reason.

KEEP UP
I clicked through and i'm more confused now, I guess I have to read a page back or something.

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #1995 on: July 31, 2019, 03:27:16 AM »
Fuck you Mandark, I'm mad all over again

IIRC I was going off your "people gotta chill, whipping your dick out in public is fine" stance from the #metoo thread.

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #1996 on: July 31, 2019, 03:28:29 AM »
I'm consistent when calling out media sources I read for dumb-assery btw.

I don't see why you need to be so closed-minded and dismissive of media sources you disagree with, instead of seeing their point of view and potentially re-examining assumptions on your own side?
I specifically do though? I read the report then criticize it, hence the 'I read' in the sentence.  :confused

You're doing this thing again, being adversarial for no real reason.

shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #1997 on: July 31, 2019, 03:28:47 AM »
Fuck you Mandark, I'm mad all over again

IIRC I was going off your "people gotta chill, whipping your dick out in public is fine" stance from the #metoo thread.
omg, did I defend some people in the #metoo thread? :rkelly

Don't you dare dig up receipts. I don't want to see them.
每天生气

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #1998 on: July 31, 2019, 03:29:42 AM »
I specifically do though? I read the report then criticize it, hence the 'I read' in the sentence.

No you don't, you make blanket statements about "the media" and don't back them up when asked for clarification.

Remember when you said Vox was just like Gawker? ell oh ell

jakefromstatefarm

  • Senior Member
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #1999 on: July 31, 2019, 03:31:31 AM »
jake should have a blog
the blogosphere is dead and 90% of it moved to twitter and this is legit the shittiest thing ever for all the obvious reasons. An appropriate topic for a thread like this to cover is how worthless intellectual discourse is online in the first age where the internet’s everywhere and being used by everyone.

spoiler (click to show/hide)
All of my well actuallys are just regurgitating stuff from blogs that I follow + open source material (like that sep link above) + first impressions (that is to say NOT systematic deep readings) of primary sources. The upshot is pretty much always either ‘this is harder than you think; there are a range of tenable positions, so cool it with the incendiaries’ or ‘you’re being a numbnuts about how you’re interpreting this, you need to be both more critical and more charitable’.
[close]

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #2000 on: July 31, 2019, 03:32:00 AM »
omg, did I defend some people in the #metoo thread? :rkelly

Don't you dare dig up receipts. I don't want to see them.

OH IT'S TOO LATE

In the context of Terry Crews:

No, it should be considered as an inappropriate drunk groping during a Christmas party. That guy was so trashed everyone kicked him out of the party. That stuff just happens when you're blackout.

You should all click through, some good memories there.

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #2001 on: July 31, 2019, 03:32:42 AM »
I specifically do though? I read the report then criticize it, hence the 'I read' in the sentence.

No you don't, you make blanket statements about "the media" and don't back them up when asked for clarification.

Remember when you said Vox was just like Gawker? ell oh ell
They are, how many Carlos Maza articles do you want me to send you? They do not hold themselves to a high standard of journalism, I read Vox but i fact check. 

Again what are you doing here? Just trying to be adversarial until I back down as usual cause this isnt worth my time?

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #2002 on: July 31, 2019, 03:34:50 AM »
Nah, you're just retconning past discussions from this board and I'm calling it out. Not personal, but don't ask for receipts if you don't want them.


edit: or as shosta showed, don't ask for no receipts either. Listen, you're getting receipts.

shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #2003 on: July 31, 2019, 03:36:50 AM »
don't ask for receipts if you don't want them.
You hand them out anyway :rage

That PD response was so good though :lol
每天生气

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #2004 on: July 31, 2019, 03:38:10 AM »
I'm still reading back btw, I still dont get your problem with that specific post. Would have helped if I was quoting something, I tend to anwer stuff pages back with a general thought so idk.

shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #2005 on: July 31, 2019, 03:38:50 AM »
I linked to Quillette in the old wank dad thread :dead just kill me now

Quote from: Shostakovich
real story, there was a girl who was interested in me, and I gave her an anthology of Sylvia Plath poems for her birthday, and we straight up just stopped talking

maybe the canon would have worked better???
:fbm

Quote
hey Jake, I just read The Genealogy of Morals. Can you... please explain to me how Nietzsche is not an anti-Semitic fascist?
make it stop :stahp
« Last Edit: July 31, 2019, 03:44:16 AM by shosta »
每天生气

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #2006 on: July 31, 2019, 03:43:37 AM »
I think I understand now - it's a general thought, not specific to Frozen. first part was directed at most of the people in thread (ourselves) second part was for the etoilets, third part is my standing criticism of JP.

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #2007 on: July 31, 2019, 03:46:25 AM »
Dude I get that you're conflict-averse and that's just a matter of personal disposition, but you gotta recognize that trying to impose guidelines in the middle of a roast is kinda priggish and not going to get good results.

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #2008 on: July 31, 2019, 03:48:22 AM »
Dude I get that you're conflict-averse and that's just a matter of personal disposition, but you gotta recognize that trying to impose guidelines in the middle of a roast is kinda priggish and not going to get good results.
The fact that you see discussing ideas as a roast is a problem to me. I'm not averse to conflict or debate, I'm averse to wasting time.

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #2009 on: July 31, 2019, 03:49:22 AM »
Dude I get that you're conflict-averse and that's just a matter of personal disposition, but you gotta recognize that trying to impose guidelines in the middle of a roast is kinda priggish and not going to get good results.
The fact that you see discussing ideas as a roast is a problem to me.

Well if it's a discussion of ideas, then jumping in to unilaterally dictate which aspects people should criticize would be even worse.

shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #2010 on: July 31, 2019, 03:49:38 AM »
Quote
I can't point to an empirical metric. Actually, I can't even think of one that would be meaningfully related. I concede that's usually a good starting point for claiming anything is ever a problem at all.
Shostakovich 2018 or Leadbelly 2019?
每天生气

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #2011 on: July 31, 2019, 03:53:08 AM »
the blogosphere is dead and 90% of it moved to twitter and this is legit the shittiest thing ever for all the obvious reasons. An appropriate topic for a thread like this to cover is how worthless intellectual discourse is online in the first age where the internet’s everywhere and being used by everyone.

The character limit is understandably the focus of discussions of Twitter, but I think dumping everyone into the same de facto message board has as much to do with anything in both its popularity and toxicity.

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #2012 on: July 31, 2019, 03:58:57 AM »
Dude I get that you're conflict-averse and that's just a matter of personal disposition, but you gotta recognize that trying to impose guidelines in the middle of a roast is kinda priggish and not going to get good results.
The fact that you see discussing ideas as a roast is a problem to me.

Well if it's a discussion of ideas, then jumping in to unilaterally dictate which aspects people should criticize would be even worse.
You're acting like having standards when discussing ideas is somehow a flaw and claiming what's happening in this thread (in general) is criticism. This thread and that one is different. I pop into this thread every couple of months and it's ad hominem and mockery garbage, which is fine, that's what this thread is. Originally when I complained, etoilet seemed to want to discuss his ideas seriously and I was willing to give him the space to do so and to offer criticism where applicable, so my complaints there doesnt apply here.

shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #2013 on: July 31, 2019, 04:01:34 AM »
I finally got to the part in the thread where Etiolate flips out and posts pictures of starving kids. What a legendary thread.
每天生气

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #2014 on: July 31, 2019, 04:14:46 AM »
I finally got to the part in the thread where Etiolate flips out and posts pictures of starving kids. What a legendary thread.
did you get to the part where he got unbanned and did it again? :lol

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #2015 on: July 31, 2019, 04:16:09 AM »
Originally when I complained, etoilet seemed to want to discuss his ideas seriously and I was willing to give him the space to do so and to offer criticism where applicable, so my complaints there doesnt apply here.

So now looking back you can see I had a more accurate read on the situation.

shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #2016 on: July 31, 2019, 04:18:02 AM »
Holy crap, I forgot that we've already been here with Leadbelly, the furtive pygmy, so easily forgotten.

http://www.thebore.com/forum/index.php?topic=45437.msg2429400#msg2429400

Shame on Mandark for not activating his photographic memory and linking us back to his posts from a year ago, and instead using it to besmirch me, an innocent bystander.
每天生气

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #2017 on: July 31, 2019, 04:22:50 AM »
Originally when I complained, etoilet seemed to want to discuss his ideas seriously and I was willing to give him the space to do so and to offer criticism where applicable, so my complaints there doesnt apply here.

So now looking back you can see I had a more accurate read on the situation.
for sure.

I think leadbelly deserves more though, probably chose the wrong thread to try and engage in, but I dont think it goes better anywhere else, although I wish it did and we'd give each other the benefit that years of posting along side each other gives.

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #2018 on: July 31, 2019, 04:34:38 AM »
Honestly, I don't think that knowing someone for a long time means you need to consider their ideas more seriously (especially if they have a track record of dopey ideas), or that you necessarily need to handle them with kid gloves.

Kosma's been around forever and is part of the social fabric here, but we were all able to be pretty direct in telling him he was acting a fool in that Roman Polanski thread. I think the results were both better and funnier because of it.

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #2019 on: July 31, 2019, 04:42:12 AM »
Eh, but he doesnt ever engage seriously lol
 
Honestly, I don't think that knowing someone for a long time means you need to consider their ideas more seriously (especially if they have a track record of dopey ideas), or that you necessarily need to handle them with kid gloves.
Depends, I don't think he's coming from a disingenuous place, which is why it's worth having him explain further without sending him to the defensive place from the start. I'm always curious when people who have similar beliefs to me come to different conclusions, I feel there's an opportunity to learn or teach. 
« Last Edit: July 31, 2019, 04:52:33 AM by Momo »

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #2020 on: July 31, 2019, 04:43:15 AM »
I can't wait till Mandark unveils his own problematic opinion so we can all dogpile him.

Like I dunno, if he was like a massive fan of Jane Austen or something.
I'd be in here trying to hold back the flood for Mandark too  :mjcry

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #2021 on: July 31, 2019, 05:02:56 AM »
I don't think he's coming from a disingenuous place

he is

curly

  • cultural maoist
  • Senior Member
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #2022 on: July 31, 2019, 05:34:25 AM »
Quote
don't make the mistake of thinking I want to discuss bullshit like this seriously

my philosophy towards all leadbelly posts

Oblivion

  • Senior Member
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #2023 on: July 31, 2019, 05:45:15 AM »
Quote from: Shostakovich
Quote from: Oblivion
Shos, I gotta say, I'm a bit disappointed with you. I totally expect someone like etiloiate to dismiss such an article, but not you.
Then you've misread me completely. I side with etiolate most of the time he posts.
oh my god

yeah, you were pretty awful, my dude. but i'm glad you (unwillingly) stopped hanging out with a bad crowd :heart

Oblivion

  • Senior Member
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #2024 on: July 31, 2019, 05:47:02 AM »
if etoilet were still around, shosta would be a beta tester for thinkspot right about now

shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #2025 on: July 31, 2019, 05:50:17 AM »
That's not true. I started defecting from et around the beginning of May and, while I don't want to overstate my role here, I'm pretty sure him losing his only toady in that thread tilted him right over the edge just two weeks later.
每天生气

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #2026 on: July 31, 2019, 05:52:21 AM »
shosta is proof that being relentlessly sassed by me builds character

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #2027 on: July 31, 2019, 06:11:56 AM »
shosta is proof that being relentlessly sassed by me builds character
well, then you have to take responsibility for Kosma too  :patel

BIONIC

  • Virgo. Live Music. The Office. Tacos. Fur mom. True crime junkie. INTJ.
  • Senior Member
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #2028 on: July 31, 2019, 07:18:55 AM »
ok leadbelly... I have made a checklist of statements pertaining to issues both modern and historical and I'd like you to list either "agree" or "disagree" next to each one, with an optional ONE sentence of clarification (please use very sparingly). Within each section, I've tried to keep the point of view consistent. Here they are:

[public spending]
- If you earn more, you should pay more in taxes.
- The rich are not taxed highly enough in my country.
- It's shameful that people are allowed to make money simply by virtue of having wealth (stocks, rent, loans).
- Universal healthcare is a good idea.
- We should never privatize education.
- Higher education should be free, just like primary and secondary education are.

[identity issues]
- Racism is alive and well in my country.
- Systemic racism contributes to the continued oppression of racial minorities.
- Undocumented immigrants who have been living in my country should have some kind of legal status.
- Gender is a social construct and people should be free to identify as male or female.
- Human sexual preference is mostly biologically determined.
- Gay marriage should be legal.
- You should not be able to discriminate against someone on the basis of their sexual preference.
- Ditto, but for sexual identity.
- Ditto, but for race or gender.

[women's rights]
- Women have just as much of a right as men to be in the workplace.
- Contraception and abortion procedures should be legal (up to the third trimester).
- Abortion should be legal even in the third trimester.
- The cost of childcare is a major barrier for women to enter the workforce. We need public daycare or daycare vouchers.
- #MeToo is an important cultural movement.

[islam]
- People from majority muslim countries often have certain values which are fundamentally incompatible with western values.
- The refugee crisis in Europe is doing long-term damage to European society.
- Liberals are too quick to stand up for refugees from war-torn countries.
- We do not have a responsibility for fixing these countries or taking their needy.
- Christopher Hitchens was a brilliant debater.

[economy]
- Unions are, for the most part, a good idea.
- Laws that forbid workplaces from forcing employees to join unions are anti-union and should be opposed. [this used to say "Right to Work", which means something different in the UK, sorry]
- The government should provide a federal job guarantee because there is so much unemployment and so much infrastructure and community work that needs to be done.
- BREXIT is not a good idea.
- Free trade is generally good.
- CEOs make way too much money for what they actually do (nothing).

[climate]
- Climate change is real and anthropogenic.
- We should fund green technology.
- We should mobilize the nation to reduce our carbon output by a certain amount by a certain date.
- We should help depopulate Bangladesh into surrounding areas because it's going to be underwater and it's our fault.

[war and peace]
- My country should not sign a no-first-use promise for the use of nuclear weapons (my country should never use nuclear weapons first).
- My country's military protects my freedom.
- Saddam Hussein had to be deposed.
- If my country leaves Afghanistan, the Taliban will come back and my country will be at risk again.
- China is a threat to global peace.
- The US military should stay in South Korea.
- The US should overthrow the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.
- My country should maintain its current level of defense spending.

[general liberal issues]
- My country puts far too many people in jail.
- Flagburning is a right.
- The death penalty is wrong and should be abolished.
- Irrespective of Israel's right to defend itself from terrorism, Palestine is illegally occupied.
- The sanctions on Venezuela are needlessly compounding its economic crisis.

spoiler (click to show/hide)
[scientific socialism]
- The industrial processes, especially supply chains with numerous levels of intermediate goods, are becoming increasingly more centrally planned by the firm owners, even and especially when these supply chains span multiple continents. This contradiction within the modern free market economy is empirical evidence that central planning by bureaucratic authorities in the age of computation is a perfectly efficient method of allocating resources.

- Work by economists like Hyman Minsky, Thomas Piketty, and Steve Keen, show rigorously that the existence of a privately owned finance sector produces a structurally unstable economy that is bound to produce serious economic crashes and exponentially greater inequality that is fundamentally inconsistent with democratic values. The nation's largest capital reserves must be publicly owned, from now until forever.

- When a large firm takes one component of its supply chain and moves it overseas from a developed nation to an underdeveloped one, with no change in the skillset of its labor or the efficiency of its capital, but the price of the intermediate good is still reduced by an order of magnitude, this is a deliberate act of exploitation which produces superprofits for the firm and/or superprofits for the consumer in the developed nation (and this surplus is then circulated through the rest of the economy, arbitrarily inflating its standard of living). Third world factory workers must unionize and reverse this "free trade" theft of wealth.

- The media is owned by major financial firms and operated by ruling elites and thus will always filter or distort news to serve its own interests. The public and labor must therefore own an alternative media.

- Post-USSR globalism has made income inequality even worse, both between nations, and within each nation.

- These and other contradictions will eventually lead to the end of capitalism itself.
[close]

Get a job, you dumb bitch.
Margs

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #2029 on: July 31, 2019, 09:27:09 AM »
I finally got to the part in the thread where Etiolate flips out and posts pictures of starving kids. What a legendary thread.

Etiolate always reminded people what an incredible intellectual he was and how he was so much better than everyone here, yet he ended up getting triggered off the face of the planet by Mandark, benji and Teen Vogue. And he was still triggered two days later after coming back from his first ban.

:neogaf  :sabu :curious :era :mueller :girlaff :woody
« Last Edit: July 31, 2019, 09:32:03 AM by Great Rumbler »
dog

Van Cruncheon

  • live mas or die trying
  • Banned
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #2030 on: July 31, 2019, 11:49:30 AM »
Forget what my intentions are. What you should be concerned with is, is there merit to my argument.

you reiterate this belief a lot but it's wrong and you probably don't even believe it

Yeah. I recall going through this with you before. There seems to be a bit of a blind spot there. I find it hard to understand why there is disagreement there.

If a serial killer said the sky is blue, it doesn't mean he must be wrong because he is a serial killer. The sky is blue.

Look it is not up to me whether you agree or disagree, it is up to you. And ultimately you either see logic in an argument or you do not. What you shouldn't be doing however is looking for ways to disagree simply because of a person's political leanings or whatever.

And I genuinely believe it because I realised it is actully beneficial to do this for my own intellectual development. It does me no good in the long run to hold to falsehoods. But it is hard to see that sometimes. And we're all ultimately biased creatures which includes myself. It is hard to get around that. When you listen to someone you fundamentally diagree with it is hard to listen. What you tend to do is find ways to dismiss them. Lets say one thing they say is inaccurate. That's enough for us to dismiss everything they say. Because we don't like what they have to say to begin with.

Again though, it's when you realise it is not actually beneficial to yourself that things seem to click. Not that you will be rid of all bias, but probably more aware of you're own infallibility on that matter.

you gotta admit, ted bundy had great hair
duc

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #2031 on: July 31, 2019, 01:03:52 PM »
tbh Momo, it's pretty disingenuous to say we are "just looking for enemies" when people routinely pop in here to defend the likes of Alex Jones and other chuds. But yeah, everyone totally has the same views about everything.

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #2032 on: July 31, 2019, 01:08:11 PM »
Fuck you Mandark, I'm mad all over again

IIRC I was going off your "people gotta chill, whipping your dick out in public is fine" stance from the #metoo thread.
omg, did I defend some people in the #metoo thread? :rkelly

Don't you dare dig up receipts. I don't want to see them.

you seem malleable as fuck, I hope you never get approached by some cult like Tyler did

Leadbelly

  • Senior Member
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #2033 on: July 31, 2019, 01:16:55 PM »
The idea that I am being disingenious is the most ridiculous bullshit take on things of them all. Why waste my time engaging with you at all?

I mean what the fuck do you think I would get out of that? I am on some secret covert mission or something to convert you to conservatism? This is as bad as ERA seriously. I

Okay, Momo was right, you shouldn't engage with people in here, because they can't thnk outside of their own bubble. And you really can't. Like for instance the nonsense about the term far-right. And I am thinking maybe you don't understand that point because of the Eurocentric angle of it that you may not be aware of. I also think you're not trying to understand. And that is the thing.

We are in a time now in Europe where the public are on the move politically. More people are moving to the right. Right wing populism hasn't won, but it is clear it has made huge gains. There has been a trend however to just label these groups far-right. And in turn what happens is the issues that are the reason the public are on the move are not adequately being addressed. I am of the opinion that is dangerous.

I also linked a video which I guess did not get listened to, or wasn't taken seriously. Either way all I really wanted you to acknowledge was that there is a sense of logic in what is being said. What it is not for instance, is some secret covert plan to water down the term far-right so that I can express my real views in public. And now I am starting to believe that is something you people believe.

There is a sense of logic in that video. However, it is Eurocentric which is why I explained that.


People say I am being defensive, which I am. When people post in a way that can be perceived as an attack, people post defensively. However, what I am made aware of now, is in fact you are all posting defensively. Which is why you respond to me the way you do. You can't get over your own bias enough to actually genuinely engage.

So I will leave you to it in this thread.





« Last Edit: July 31, 2019, 02:24:52 PM by Leadbelly »

Oblivion

  • Senior Member
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #2034 on: July 31, 2019, 01:23:46 PM »
That's not true. I started defecting from et around the beginning of May and, while I don't want to overstate my role here, I'm pretty sure him losing his only toady in that thread tilted him right over the edge just two weeks later.

i'm actually curious. at what point did you realize etoilet wasn''t a good role model anymore?

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #2035 on: July 31, 2019, 01:27:11 PM »
you seem malleable as fuck, I hope you never get approached by some cult like Tyler did
he already registered as a member of the Libertarian Party breh

team filler

  • filler
  • filler
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #2036 on: July 31, 2019, 01:29:08 PM »
 :curious
*****

Leadbelly

  • Senior Member
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #2037 on: July 31, 2019, 01:29:42 PM »
Well, considering you can't really engage properly with ideas you don't agree with, which you can't, as you have made me aware in this last page, maybe he flipped out because of that. Not something I would do, but fuck me.

BisMarckie

  • Senior Member
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #2038 on: July 31, 2019, 01:30:27 PM »
#free etiolate

He provided us with hours of entertainment for free :tocry

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: Wank Dad 2: Electric Wankaloo
« Reply #2039 on: July 31, 2019, 01:48:53 PM »
I'm sort of sad I missed reactionary shosta, this is why you should never take a hiatus from the bore :mjcry

Keep in mind, this was after he built up his reputation as "Kristoffer the one non-reactionary and even-keeled Era mod."